On 02/09/2010 05:06 PM, malc wrote:
We already have this problem with the current interface.
Uh, i've meant the registration of one function to rule them all, instead
of how it's done currently - separate accessors for b/w/l/whatever.
How does that make any difference? Both the ioport and memory
registrations interface take the same function pointer regardless of
access size.
If you wanted to introduce a quad-word specific accessor, you would need
to introduce a different registration mechanism or you would have to
change the signature for all of the functions.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
