n 5 August 2014 08:08, Michael Tokarev <m...@tls.msk.ru> wrote: > 05.08.2014 08:41, Chen Gang wrote: >> >> Every members have their own tastes, and one working flow may be not >> suitable for all members. I can understand, and hope other members >> understand too. >> >> At least for me, next, I shall send patch to the members which I can get >> from 'get_maintainers.pl' and only Cc to qemu-devel. And shall skip >> qemu-trivial and Michael Tokarev. > > Why skip both? It's your call, but I'm curious.
I think that is a misunderstanding. You asked not to get mails cc'd to both you personally and qemu-trivial at the same time, and Chen misread this to mean not to cc either address. Trivial patches should still be sent "To: qemu-devel + Cc: qemu-trivial". > What I _think_ wrong is that get_maintainers.pl lists many random > "patchers" for a given file by default. Yes, I think it's probably reasonable to change it to make it not default to "--git-fallback". Do you want to submit a patch? (Perhaps we could make it cc qemu-orphan@ if we wanted to flag up holes in our MAINTAINERS coverage and patches liable to get lost, but that probably only makes sense if we have people who would care enough to do that monitoring work.) thanks -- PMM
