On Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 07:54:30AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2014-08-01 19:16, Alex Williamson wrote: > >> Also, it may let some of our device > >> models deviate from their real versions (I suppose, e.g., none of the > >> e1000 devices we currently emulate exposed FLR). > > > > Of course, but what are the chances that the driver will care? > > No drivers of GPOSes, but special or legacy OSes may do so. Keep in mind > that Intel e.g. is documenting their PCI devices with fixed config space > addresses for their capability. > > Also, we completely lack PM caps so far. Adding them would already have > the value of increasing emulation accuracy. And here I think we are free > to always implement reset behavior behind D3->D0 transitions. So my > believe is that this will be the better path. > > Jan > >
That's true but is PM reset per-function or per-device? I'll have to check the spec - do you happen to rememeber?
