Of the two functions portio_list_del and portio_list_destroy, the latter is just freeing a memory area. However, portio_list_del is the logical equivalent of memory_region_del_subregion so destruction of memory regions does not belong there.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> --- ioport.c | 11 ++++++++--- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/ioport.c b/ioport.c index 3d91e79..dce94a3 100644 --- a/ioport.c +++ b/ioport.c @@ -149,6 +149,14 @@ void portio_list_set_flush_coalesced(PortioList *piolist) void portio_list_destroy(PortioList *piolist) { + MemoryRegionPortioList *mrpio; + unsigned i; + + for (i = 0; i < piolist->nr; ++i) { + mrpio = container_of(piolist->regions[i], MemoryRegionPortioList, mr); + memory_region_destroy(&mrpio->mr); + g_free(mrpio); + } g_free(piolist->regions); } @@ -291,8 +299,5 @@ void portio_list_del(PortioList *piolist) for (i = 0; i < piolist->nr; ++i) { mrpio = container_of(piolist->regions[i], MemoryRegionPortioList, mr); memory_region_del_subregion(piolist->address_space, &mrpio->mr); - memory_region_destroy(&mrpio->mr); - g_free(mrpio); - piolist->regions[i] = NULL; } } -- 1.8.3.1