On 2014-07-30 10:41, Alex Bligh wrote: > On 30/07/2014 08:02, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> Yet identical to 2.1. > > If it's *really* identical to 2.1, are we going to add the > 2.2 machine type to 2.1 as well, so that things that > have difficulty using different source and destination > machine types can migrate from 2.2 to 2.1? > > Or am I missing the point and is the issue that 2.2 > is actually different to 2.1, not in the machine > type definition, but in what is sent within the > migrated data? If so, a commit message to this > effect might be helpful.
See patch 3 for the (current) motivation of this patch. Maybe more will come as 2.2 evolves. Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SES-DE Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
