Il 18/07/2014 19:14, Dr. David Alan Gilbert ha scritto: > * Dr. David Alan Gilbert (dgilb...@redhat.com) wrote: >> * Peter Maydell (peter.mayd...@linaro.org) wrote: >>> So we just released rc2. The proposed schedule has >>> rc3 next Tuesday, with final release the Tuesday after. >>> >>> My thought is that we should aim for rc3 to add only >>> a fairly small number of focussed and "safe" bugfixes, >>> with the intention of making the final release be the >>> same as rc3 if no showstopper bugs are discovered. >>> If there are any showstoppers in rc3 we have a week >>> to fix them and roll and test an rc4. >>> >>> Does it seem to other people like we're on track for that? >>> I don't do the level of testing that I think Anthony had >>> access to, so I'm reliant on those of you doing testing >>> of the rc tarballs to report problems... >> >> There's something going on with migration; although we're >> passing virt-test and my tests with google stress app test, >> the thread on virtio-blk failures is one bad thing, and I've >> got another failure case (possibly ide cdrom but not obvious) >> that seems to be new somewhere between 2.0 and 2.1-rc0. > > Mine I seem to have bisected down to fe680d0dac85e0f2d6c3b53838c250f6e0b1f49b > 'exec: Limit translation limiting in address_space_translate to xen' > > I'm told this doesn't necessarily make sense, but: > works 62622c11f230edddcc47aabe2d988555bf125993 > broken fe680d0dac85e0f2d6c3b53838c250f6e0b1f49b > > (confirmed by running each twice) > and : > b18a990c - good > cab00a5aa - good > > This is squashfs on a livecd falling apart after migration.
Can you give precise reproduction instructions before leaving? Which OS is being installed? Paolo
