Il 18/07/2014 16:15, Andreas Färber ha scritto: > I was mainly concerned about qom-set, but same goes for qom-get. The > breakage would be in 2.2, if in 2.1 we introduce properties with foo_bar > and rename them to foo-bar in 2.2. Since they're not in 2.0, I had asked > Marcel to rename them for 2.1 on a KVM call. > > I checked that sPAPR is not affected, so the only issue is the trivial > g_free(). Since apart from sPAPR we have a compact snippet of properties > being added, grep'ing for occurrences of the old strings and verifying > that the patch changes all properties should be safe for -rc3 if Peter > would be willing to take a pull.
Okay, I agree. Paolo
