On 07/15/2014 06:29 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 14/07/2014 05:17, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto: >>> > No, you should politely bother them again. >> >> That does not seem helping though :-/ > > Sorry. :) > > Well, patch 1 is the same as v6 and for the others Cornelia and Alex can > ack it. It looks good to me though.
Let me clarify things here. Alex rb'ed to 0/4, Cornelia rb'ed 2/4 and 3/4, so I put Alex's rb to 1&2&3&4&5, Cornelia's rb to 2&3, rebase it on top of the current upstream, repost after 2.1 is released and resume annoying people again. Is that correct? This is my current set: 5/5 pc_piix: Migrate to new NMI interface 4/5 spapr: Add support for new NMI interface 3/5 s390x: Migrate to new NMI interface 2/5 s390x: Convert QEMUMachine to MachineClass 1/5 cpus: Define callback for QEMU "nmi" command -- Alexey