On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 4:42 AM, Nikolay Nikolaev
<n.nikol...@virtualopensystems.com> wrote:
>
> qemu_get_ram_fd doesn't accept a guest physical address. ram_addr_t are
> opaque values that are assigned in qemu_ram_alloc.
>
> Find the ram_addr_t corresponding to the userspace_addr using 
> qemu_ram_addr_from_host,
> and then call qemu_get_ram_fd on it.
>
> Thanks to Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Nikolaev <n.nikol...@virtualopensystems.com>
> ---
>  hw/virtio/vhost-user.c |    4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c b/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c
> index 38e5806..d610aa4 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c
> +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c
> @@ -216,7 +216,9 @@ static int vhost_user_call(struct vhost_dev *dev, 
> unsigned long int request,
>      case VHOST_SET_MEM_TABLE:
>          for (i = 0; i < dev->mem->nregions; ++i) {
>              struct vhost_memory_region *reg = dev->mem->regions + i;
> -            fd = qemu_get_ram_fd(reg->guest_phys_addr);
> +            ram_addr_t ram_addr;
> +            qemu_ram_addr_from_host((void*)reg->userspace_addr, &ram_addr);
Forgot to checkpatch. Should have space after the void - (void *).

Michael, should I resend it?
> +            fd = qemu_get_ram_fd(ram_addr);
>              if (fd > 0) {
>                  msg.memory.regions[fd_num].userspace_addr = 
> reg->userspace_addr;
>                  msg.memory.regions[fd_num].memory_size  = reg->memory_size;
>

Reply via email to