From: Miroslav Rezanina <mreza...@redhat.com>
If --enable-stack-protector is used is used, configure script try to use
--fstack-protector-strong. In case it's not supported, --fstack-protector-all
is enabled. If both protectors are not supported, configure does not use
any protector at all without any notification.
This patch reports error when user requests stack protector to be used and
both protector modes are not supported. Behavior is not changed in case
user do not use any of --enable-stack-protector/--disable-stack-protector.
Signed-off-by: Miroslav Rezanina <mreza...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
---
configure | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/configure b/configure
index 7dd43fd..b880954 100755
--- a/configure
+++ b/configure
@@ -1491,6 +1491,7 @@ done
if test "$stack_protector" != "no" ; then
gcc_flags="-fstack-protector-strong -fstack-protector-all"
+ sp_on=0
for flag in $gcc_flags; do
# We need to check both a compile and a link, since some compiler
# setups fail only on a .c->.o compile and some only at link time
@@ -1498,9 +1499,15 @@ if test "$stack_protector" != "no" ; then
compile_prog "-Werror $flag" ""; then
QEMU_CFLAGS="$QEMU_CFLAGS $flag"
LIBTOOLFLAGS="$LIBTOOLFLAGS -Wc,$flag"
+ sp_on=1
break
fi
done
+ if test "$stack_protector" == "yes" ; then
+ if test "$sp_on" == "0" ; then
+ error_exit "Stack protector not supported"
+ fi
+ fi
fi
# Workaround for http://gcc.gnu.org/PR55489. Happens with -fPIE/-fPIC and
--
1.8.3.1
