* Eric Blake (ebl...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On 07/04/2014 11:41 AM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) wrote:
> > From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilb...@redhat.com>
> > 
> > check the return value of the function it calls and error if it's none-0
> > Fixup qemu_rdma_init_one_block that is the only current caller,
> >   and __qemu_rdma_add_block the only function it calls using it.
> 
> As long as you are at it, is it worth renaming the use of __qemu prefix
> in a function name?  That namespace is reserved for the compiler/libc,
> and we shouldn't be stomping on it.  Probably best as a separate patch.

Yeh it sounds separate, but worth doing but this was getting a large enough
set of patches already.

Dave

> 
> > 
> > Pass the name of the ramblock to the function; helps in debugging.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilb...@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  exec.c                    | 10 ++++++++--
> >  include/exec/cpu-common.h |  4 ++--
> >  migration-rdma.c          |  4 ++--
> >  3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com>
> 
> -- 
> Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
> Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
> 


--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilb...@redhat.com / Manchester, UK

Reply via email to