On 1 July 2014 16:58, Anton Ivanov (antivano) <antiv...@cisco.com> wrote: > On 01/07/14 16:34, Peter Maydell wrote: >> We don't need to support this optional feature on RHEL5, we >> just need not to die horribly trying to compile it when we're >> on an older system, that's all. This patch should be enough for >> this, right? > > As a stop-gap - yes. An argument to configure which enables disables > the feature should be good for now.
This patch doesn't add any configure arguments: it just says "if there's no struct definition we won't build l2tpv3.c". thanks -- PMM
