On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 07:43:48AM -0800, Richard Henderson wrote: >> This patch uses a more complex search algorithm that takes the result >> of the previous allocation into account. We normally search upward, >> but notice 2 consecutive results and start searching downward instead.
> I've failed to take guest_base into account properly; my testing > happened to have guest_base = 0. New patch to follow. Did you have time to look at this again?
