On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 08:43:08PM +0200, Max Reitz wrote: > exp->name == name is certainly true if both strings are equal and will > work for both of them being NULL (which is important to check here); > however, the strings may also be equal without having the same address, > in which case there is no need to replace the export's name either. > Therefore, add a check for this case. > > Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mre...@redhat.com> > --- > nbd.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/nbd.c b/nbd.c > index e5084b6..0787cba 100644 > --- a/nbd.c > +++ b/nbd.c > @@ -832,7 +832,7 @@ NBDExport *nbd_export_find(const char *name) > > void nbd_export_set_name(NBDExport *exp, const char *name) > { > - if (exp->name == name) { > + if (exp->name == name || (exp->name && name && !strcmp(exp->name, > name))) { > return; > }
It's not clear to me why we even bother. The function is idempotent and there are only 2 call sites in QEMU. This is not a performance-critical function where it helps to bail early. Can we just drop the if statement completely? void nbd_export_set_name(NBDExport *exp, const char *name) { if (exp->name == name) { return; } nbd_export_get(exp); if (exp->name != NULL) { g_free(exp->name); exp->name = NULL; QTAILQ_REMOVE(&exports, exp, next); nbd_export_put(exp); } if (name != NULL) { nbd_export_get(exp); exp->name = g_strdup(name); QTAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&exports, exp, next); } nbd_export_put(exp); }