On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 03:37:29PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >     QEMUIOVector *inhdr;            /* iovecs for virtio_blk_inhdr */
> 
> This can be unified with the "in" field; the status is only one byte, so
> using a full-blown QEMUIOVector is overkill.  Stefan, what do you think?

I thought about this when initially writing the code, but it seemed like
a hack to assume virtio_blk_inhdr will always be 1 byte.

virtio-blk is unlikely to change much since the focus is on virtio-scsi
rather than piling on more virtio-blk feature.

I still prefer we treat it like a struct without making size
assumptions, but if the code turns out to be nicer then I don't mind.

Stefan

Reply via email to