[quoted lines by Gerd Hoffmann on 2014/06/02 at 13:28 +0200] Hi:
>Little series of four input patches. Yes, it all seems to work correctly, now, with these four patches applied. Perhaps there should be a common constant that all the delay calls use. Maybe even a variable which defaults to 10 and is set by something like the -k delay= in my patch. That'd allow users to modify it if it isn't quite right in some other circumstance, as well as to reduce it to 0 if they perceive a need to do so. It might be a good idea to introduce an intermediate call which doesn't have a "length of delay" argument, which then calls the current function with the desired value. These are, of course, cosmetic suggestions. The code as it now stands dodes work. -- Dave Mielke | 2213 Fox Crescent | The Bible is the very Word of God. Phone: 1-613-726-0014 | Ottawa, Ontario | http://Mielke.cc/bible/ EMail: d...@mielke.cc | Canada K2A 1H7 | http://FamilyRadio.com/
