On 01/04/2010 09:49 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
This adds notifiers for phys memory changes: a set of callbacks that
vhost can register and update kernel accordingly. Down the road, kvm
code can be switched to use these as well, instead of calling kvm code
directly from exec.c as is done now.
+
+static void phys_page_for_each_in_l1_map(PhysPageDesc **phys_map,
+ CPUPhysMemoryClient *client)
+{
+ PhysPageDesc *pd;
+ int l1, l2;
+
+ for (l1 = 0; l1< L1_SIZE; ++l1) {
+ pd = phys_map[l1];
+ if (!pd) {
+ continue;
+ }
+ for (l2 = 0; l2< L2_SIZE; ++l2) {
+ if (pd[l2].phys_offset == IO_MEM_UNASSIGNED) {
+ continue;
+ }
+ client->set_memory(client, pd[l2].region_offset,
+ TARGET_PAGE_SIZE, pd[l2].phys_offset);
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+static void phys_page_for_each(CPUPhysMemoryClient *client)
+{
+#if TARGET_PHYS_ADDR_SPACE_BITS> 32
+
+#if TARGET_PHYS_ADDR_SPACE_BITS> (32 + L1_BITS)
+#error unsupported TARGET_PHYS_ADDR_SPACE_BITS
+#endif
+ void **phys_map = (void **)l1_phys_map;
+ int l1;
+ if (!l1_phys_map) {
+ return;
+ }
+ for (l1 = 0; l1< L1_SIZE; ++l1) {
+ if (phys_map[l1]) {
+ phys_page_for_each_in_l1_map(phys_map[l1], client);
+ }
+ }
+#else
+ if (!l1_phys_map) {
+ return;
+ }
+ phys_page_for_each_in_l1_map(l1_phys_map, client);
+#endif
+}
This looks pretty frightening. What is it needed for?
I think we should stick with range operations, but maybe I misunderstood
something here.
Otherwise, I like this patchset.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function