On 22 May 2014 01:48, Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.igles...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 08:20:20PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: >> it needs to also fix the bit in the "returning to an exception >> level which is 32 bit" which says "new_el = 0" since that's >> not guaranteed to be true any more. (Also I think the register >> mapping for AArch32 EL2/EL1 needs handling correctly.) > > I've tried to stay away from touching too much of the AArch32 > code as I haven't had a setup to test 64/32 transitions > beyond a64/el1 and a32/el0.
OK; if we put in a TODO comment that we assume EL1..EL3 are 64 bit currently, we'll have a marker to come back and fix later. thanks -- PMM
