Amit Shah <amit.s...@redhat.com> writes: > On (Wed) 21 May 2014 [11:03:04], Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: >> * Amit Shah (amit.s...@redhat.com) wrote: > >> > The idea is to be able to take a qemu binary and compare with another >> > binary; if only fields that are instantiated are used, various >> > invocations will have to be tried to find devices that may have >> > broken. >> > >> > An alternative way of checking only devices which have been added to >> > the running machine can be done via a monitor command (or a parameter >> > to the existing cmdline option). But I'm not sure if that'll be more >> > useful than the current one. >> >> Or perhaps a way to dump that info and mask your checker with it if wanted? > > A 'blacklist' file, which stores names of sections that you're not > interested in?
An error message format that lets me grep -v for sections I'm not interested in? Stupidest solution that could possibly work...
