El Tue, 13 May 2014 09:02:45 +0200
Marc Marí <marc.mari.barc...@gmail.com> escribió:
> hw/dma/i82374.c | 11 +++++------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/dma/i82374.c b/hw/dma/i82374.c
> index b8ad2e6..7026f24 100644
> --- a/hw/dma/i82374.c
> +++ b/hw/dma/i82374.c
> @@ -27,14 +27,13 @@
> //#define DEBUG_I82374
>
> #ifdef DEBUG_I82374
> -#define DPRINTF(fmt, ...) \
> -do { fprintf(stderr, "i82374: " fmt , ## __VA_ARGS__); } while (0)
> +#define DEBUG_I82374_ENABLED 1
> #else
> -#define DPRINTF(fmt, ...) \
> -do {} while (0)
> +#define DEBUG_I82374_ENABLED 0
> #endif
> -#define BADF(fmt, ...) \
> -do { fprintf(stderr, "i82374 ERROR: " fmt , ## __VA_ARGS__); } while
> (0) +
> +#define DPRINTF(fmt, ...) QEMU_DPRINTF(DEBUG_I82374_ENABLED,
> "i82374", fmt, ## __VA_ARGS__) +#define BADF(fmt, ...)
> QEMU_DPRINTF(1, "i82374 ERROR", fmt, ## __VA_ARGS__)
> typedef struct I82374State {
> uint8_t commands[8];
In this file, the function name is already written when the macros are
called, so now it will appear two times. The calls to the macro can be
changed to not add the function name, which, in my opinion, is a bit
nicer.
Marc
