* Markus Armbruster (arm...@redhat.com) wrote: > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com> writes:
<snip> > > OK but for a new machine type, let's default to BER, right? > > I see no reason to keep supporting when non-BER when -M specifies 2.1 > > compatibility, do you? > > I fail to see the relation between machine type and migration's wire > encoding. New machine types are a useful but not definitive line in the sand. If you enable something/change the default on a new machine type you know it won't break any existing users since there aren't any. Dve -- Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilb...@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
