On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 09:52:39AM +0800, Hu Tao wrote: > On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 05:59:15PM +0200, Vasilis Liaskovitis wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 06:44:42PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote: > > > On Mon, 14 Apr 2014 15:25:01 +0800 > > > Hu Tao <hu...@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 03:36:58PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote: > > > Could you be more specific, what and how doesn't work and why there is > > > need for SRAT entries per DIMM? > > > I've briefly tested with your unplug patches and linux seemed be ok with > > > unplug, > > > i.e. device node was removed from /sys after receiving remove > > > notification. > > > > Just a heads-up, is this the unplug patch that you are using for testing: > > https://github.com/taohu/qemu/commit/55c9540919e189b0ad2e6a759af742080f8f5dc4 > > > > or is there a newer version based on Igor's patchseries? > > Yeah. There is a new version. I pushed it up to > https://github.com/taohu/qemu/commits/memhp for you to check out.
cool, thanks. - Vasilis
