Am 22.04.2014 15:56, schrieb Eduardo Otubo:
> 
> 
> On 04/14/2014 03:00 PM, Eduardo Otubo wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Felix Geyer <de...@fobos.de>
>> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Otubo <ot...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> Sorry, Peter, you mean this one?
> Should I remove Acked-by? I had other patches with Acked-by merged with
> no problems before.

Apart from the issue of the Git tree [1] diverging from the patches,
your Signed-off-by should be last. There's nothing particularly wrong
with Acked-by otherwise, except that it's not adding any information
over Signed-off-by, and when used last may cause confusion.

Cheers,
Andreas

[1] https://github.com/otubo/qemu/commits/seccomp

-- 
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg

Reply via email to