On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 12:02:01PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 01/07/2010 11:08 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 06:56:31PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >>On 01/07/2010 06:53 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >>>I don't want to deviate unnecessarily from qemu-kvm so we can
> >>>approach this in one of two ways. We can remove the guard in
> >>>qemu-kvm and Avi can send me a pull request with this feature. I
> >>>can also just pull in the patch as-is and we can fix this in both
> >>>places later. I'm happy either way.
> >>Let's go through qemu-kvm.git. I'll post information about the
> >>queue policy soon.
> >>
> >Till yesterday it was other way around.
>
>
> Not qemu-kvm.git master, but a for_upstream branch that actually
> tracks qemu.git. The point is to get Avi involved in shaping the
> way kvm support in qemu.git evolves so that we can converge.
>
Ah, that's OK then.
> > May be switch rules after
> >applying the patch?
>
> Let's give Avi a chance to get his tree setup. We can revisit in a
> couple days if necessary.
>
> Regards,
>
> Anthony Liguori
> >--
> > Gleb.
--
Gleb.
