> Am 16.04.2014 um 08:26 schrieb Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com>: > > Alexander Graf <ag...@suse.de> writes: > >>> Am 15.04.2014 um 18:56 schrieb Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com>: >>> >>> Alexander Graf <ag...@suse.de> writes: >>> >>>>> On 04/15/2014 04:00 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote: >>>>> Juan Quintela <quint...@redhat.com> writes: >>>>> >>>>>> Juan Quintela <quint...@redhat.com> wrote: >>>>>>> Hi >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please, send any topic that you are interested in covering. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, Juan. >>>>>> As there are no topics, no call. >>>>> Did we have a call anyway? IRC log looks like we did... >>>> >>>> Yes, we did. Whoever attended, please reply with things I mixed up or >>>> forgot. >>>> >>>> Two topics: >>> [...] >>>> 2) -device for non-PCI devices >>> >>> Interesting stuff, hate to have missed it. >>> >>> Can we please ensure more useful advance notice than "monitor the IRC >>> channel around call time"? Decide call / no call the night before would >>> work nicely for me. >> >> I sent an email to the list earlier this werk as reply to the last >> call, because there was no mail for this week's agenda yet. > > That's probably why Juan didn't pick it up. Explanation, not > criticizing either of you. > > If we post the call's agenda the night before, there's time to correct > omissions. > > I'm fine with late agenda changes. I really don't like last minute call > / no call decisions.
How about we post the agenda mail for next time right after the last meeting? Then people have 2 weeks to gather ideas. Alex
