On Mon, 2014-04-14 at 08:32 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote: > So for chips that might be configurable, configuration has to happen via > some SPR, right? Wouldn't it make sense to transfer that configuration > SPR on these and thus the configuration as well?
Well, on a real 970 I can always go poke the clock chip via i2c but I doubt we'll ever emulate that ;-) > Really, the main problem I see with adding the tb frequency into the > migration stream is that we'd change the migration format. Worst case it > would be a few useless bytes on migration - not a big deal. But I don't > think we support any case where it would actually be required - it'd > only be a safety net. Indeed, no biggie either way then. Cheers, Ben.
