08.04.2014 14:57, Markus Armbruster wrote: > Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> writes: > >> On 8 April 2014 09:52, Michael Tokarev <m...@tls.msk.ru> wrote: >>> Well. At least one of them is entirely safe (hw/ide/ahci.c). >>> Another - xbzrle.c - looks okay, and even maybe fixing a bug. >>> And this int128 thing is okay too, except that the whole thing >>> is questionable as has been mentioned in that thread. >>> >>> I can prepare another pull request without xbzrle and int128 changes, >>> or even without ahci change too, but I'm not sure it is worth the >>> effort - I think everything is okay to go. I'll take your word for this. >> >> Well, anything that goes in today is going to get at best two >> days of being tested before the release. To me that argues >> fairly strongly for not putting anything in unless it is >> fixing a genuine bug. > > Seconded.
-trivial does not fix bugs. Only documentation bugs, which does not met the above definition. So no -trivial patches for 2.0 anymore. Thanks, /mjt
