On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 03:36:39PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> ... which is current ACPI implementation limit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imamm...@redhat.com>
With this we will have yet another hardcoded limit/assumption scattererd
in different places around the code, which we won't know how/if it can
be changed in the future.
I would prefer to have a #define and an explanation on the code for the
specific limit, so people know if/when/how it is safe to change it a few
years from now.
Something like:
hw/acpi/acpi.h:
/* current device naming scheme dosen't support
* more that 256 memory devices
*/
#define ACPI_MAX_RAM_SLOTS 256
hw/acpi/acpi-build.c:build_ssdt():
assert(nr_mem <= ACPI_MAX_RAM_SLOTS)
hw/i386/pc.c:
if (machine->init_args.ram_slots > ACPI_MAX_RAM_SLOTS) {
error_report("unsupported amount of memory slots: %"PRIu64,
machine->init_args.ram_slots);
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
> ---
> hw/i386/pc.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/hw/i386/pc.c b/hw/i386/pc.c
> index 69e4225..6fe1803 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/pc.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/pc.c
> @@ -1204,6 +1204,12 @@ FWCfgState *pc_memory_init(MemoryRegion *system_memory,
> ram_addr_t hotplug_mem_size =
> machine->init_args.maxram_size - ram_size;
>
> + if (machine->init_args.ram_slots > 256) {
> + error_report("unsupported amount of memory slots: %"PRIu64,
> + machine->init_args.ram_slots);
> + exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> + }
> +
> pcms->hotplug_memory_base =
> ROUND_UP(0x100000000ULL + above_4g_mem_size, 1ULL << 30);
>
> --
> 1.9.0
>
--
Eduardo
