On Fri, 2014-03-28 at 14:42 +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: > On 03/20/2014 06:57 AM, Alex Williamson wrote: > > On Wed, 2014-03-12 at 16:52 +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: > >> From: David Gibson <da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au> > >> > >> The only model so far supported for VFIO passthrough devices is the model > >> usually used on x86, where all of the guest's RAM is mapped into the > >> (host) IOMMU and there is no IOMMU visible in the guest. > >> > >> This patch begins to relax this model, introducing the notion of a > >> VFIOAddressSpace. This represents a logical DMA address space which will > >> be visible to one or more VFIO devices by appropriate mapping in the (host) > >> IOMMU. Thus the currently global list of containers becomes local to > >> a VFIOAddressSpace, and we verify that we don't attempt to add a VFIO > >> group to multiple address spaces. > >> > >> For now, only one VFIOAddressSpace is created and used, corresponding to > >> main system memory, that will change in future patches. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: David Gibson <da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au> > >> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <a...@ozlabs.ru> > >> > >> --- > >> Changes: > >> v5: > >> * vfio_get_group() now receives AddressSpace* > >> > >> v4: > >> * removed redundant checks and asserts > >> * fixed some return error codes > >> --- > >> hw/misc/vfio.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- > >> 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/hw/misc/vfio.c b/hw/misc/vfio.c > >> index 6a04c2a..c8236c3 100644 > >> --- a/hw/misc/vfio.c > >> +++ b/hw/misc/vfio.c > >> @@ -133,6 +133,22 @@ enum { > >> VFIO_INT_MSIX = 3, > >> }; > >> > >> +typedef struct VFIOAddressSpace { > >> + AddressSpace *as; > >> + QLIST_HEAD(, VFIOContainer) containers; > >> + QLIST_ENTRY(VFIOAddressSpace) list; > >> +} VFIOAddressSpace; > >> + > >> +QLIST_HEAD(, VFIOAddressSpace) vfio_address_spaces; > > > > Why isn't this static and initialized with QLIST_HEAD_INITIALIZER like > > the qlist it replaces? > > > I'll use QLIST_HEAD_INITIALIZER, ok. > > > It is not static because otherwise it does not compile - the actual use of > vfio_address_spaces happens in the next patches. Should I make it static > and move to the next patch? Thanks.
So you're working around an unused variable compile failure by making it non-static? Why not just move declaring it until the next patch? Thanks, Alex > >> + > >> +static VFIOAddressSpace vfio_address_space_memory; > >> + > >> +static void vfio_address_space_init(VFIOAddressSpace *space, AddressSpace > >> *as) > >> +{ > >> + space->as = as; > >> + QLIST_INIT(&space->containers); > >> +} > >> + > >> struct VFIOGroup; > >> > >> typedef struct VFIOType1 { > >> @@ -142,6 +158,7 @@ typedef struct VFIOType1 { > >> } VFIOType1; > >> > >> typedef struct VFIOContainer { > >> + VFIOAddressSpace *space; > >> int fd; /* /dev/vfio/vfio, empowered by the attached groups */ > >> struct { > >> /* enable abstraction to support various iommu backends */ > >> @@ -234,9 +251,6 @@ static const VFIORomBlacklistEntry romblacklist[] = { > >> > >> #define MSIX_CAP_LENGTH 12 > >> > >> -static QLIST_HEAD(, VFIOContainer) > >> - container_list = QLIST_HEAD_INITIALIZER(container_list); > >> - > >> static QLIST_HEAD(, VFIOGroup) > >> group_list = QLIST_HEAD_INITIALIZER(group_list); > >> > >> @@ -3280,16 +3294,15 @@ static void vfio_kvm_device_del_group(VFIOGroup > >> *group) > >> #endif > >> } > >> > >> -static int vfio_connect_container(VFIOGroup *group) > >> +static int vfio_connect_container(VFIOGroup *group, AddressSpace *as) > >> { > >> VFIOContainer *container; > >> int ret, fd; > >> + VFIOAddressSpace *space; > >> > >> - if (group->container) { > >> - return 0; > >> - } > >> + space = &vfio_address_space_memory; > >> > >> - QLIST_FOREACH(container, &container_list, next) { > >> + QLIST_FOREACH(container, &space->containers, next) { > >> if (!ioctl(group->fd, VFIO_GROUP_SET_CONTAINER, &container->fd)) { > >> group->container = container; > >> QLIST_INSERT_HEAD(&container->group_list, group, > >> container_next); > >> @@ -3312,6 +3325,7 @@ static int vfio_connect_container(VFIOGroup *group) > >> } > >> > >> container = g_malloc0(sizeof(*container)); > >> + container->space = space; > >> container->fd = fd; > >> > >> if (ioctl(fd, VFIO_CHECK_EXTENSION, VFIO_TYPE1_IOMMU)) { > >> @@ -3349,7 +3363,7 @@ static int vfio_connect_container(VFIOGroup *group) > >> } > >> > >> QLIST_INIT(&container->group_list); > >> - QLIST_INSERT_HEAD(&container_list, container, next); > >> + QLIST_INSERT_HEAD(&space->containers, container, next); > >> > >> group->container = container; > >> QLIST_INSERT_HEAD(&container->group_list, group, container_next); > >> @@ -3392,7 +3406,7 @@ static void vfio_disconnect_container(VFIOGroup > >> *group) > >> } > >> } > >> > >> -static VFIOGroup *vfio_get_group(int groupid) > >> +static VFIOGroup *vfio_get_group(int groupid, AddressSpace *as) > >> { > >> VFIOGroup *group; > >> char path[32]; > >> @@ -3400,7 +3414,14 @@ static VFIOGroup *vfio_get_group(int groupid) > >> > >> QLIST_FOREACH(group, &group_list, next) { > >> if (group->groupid == groupid) { > >> - return group; > >> + /* Found it. Now is it already in the right context? */ > >> + if (group->container->space->as == as) { > >> + return group; > >> + } else { > >> + error_report("vfio: group %d used in multiple address > >> spaces", > >> + group->groupid); > >> + return NULL; > >> + } > >> } > >> } > >> > >> @@ -3428,7 +3449,7 @@ static VFIOGroup *vfio_get_group(int groupid) > >> group->groupid = groupid; > >> QLIST_INIT(&group->device_list); > >> > >> - if (vfio_connect_container(group)) { > >> + if (vfio_connect_container(group, as)) { > >> error_report("vfio: failed to setup container for group %d", > >> groupid); > >> goto close_fd_exit; > >> } > >> @@ -3780,7 +3801,12 @@ static int vfio_initfn(PCIDevice *pdev) > >> DPRINTF("%s(%04x:%02x:%02x.%x) group %d\n", __func__, > >> vdev->host.domain, > >> vdev->host.bus, vdev->host.slot, vdev->host.function, > >> groupid); > >> > >> - group = vfio_get_group(groupid); > >> + if (pci_device_iommu_address_space(pdev) != &address_space_memory) { > >> + error_report("vfio: DMA address space must be system memory"); > >> + return -EINVAL; > >> + } > >> + > >> + group = vfio_get_group(groupid, &address_space_memory); > >> if (!group) { > >> error_report("vfio: failed to get group %d", groupid); > >> return -ENOENT; > >> @@ -3994,6 +4020,7 @@ static const TypeInfo vfio_pci_dev_info = { > >> > >> static void register_vfio_pci_dev_type(void) > >> { > >> + vfio_address_space_init(&vfio_address_space_memory, > >> &address_space_memory); > >> type_register_static(&vfio_pci_dev_info); > >> } > >> > > > > > > > >