On 03/31/2014 09:01 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 31 March 2014 13:53, Chen Gang <gang.chen.5...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 03/31/2014 08:38 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote: >>> Chen Gang <gang.chen.5...@gmail.com> writes: >>> >>>> Hello Maintainers: >>>> >>>> If it is necessary to send patch v2 by me, please let me know, I >>>> will/should send. >>> >>> Not a maintainer, but if you send a v2 with an improved commit message, >>> I'll R-by it, which can only help getting it merged. >>> >> >> I guess your meaning is "not quite necessary" (for me, minor useful >> patches almost like spam). So if sending patch v2 is really required, >> please let me know, thanks. > > Basically, asking a maintainer to make changes to a patch > as they apply it is asking them to do extra work beyond > what they would normally do. Sometimes people will agree > to do this, but in general it's better just to send a fixed > version of the patch yourself. > > (I've cc'd qemu-trivial since that's probably the best tree > to take this patch.) >
OK, thanks. And excuse me, my English is not quite well, I guess, I misunderstood the original replier's meaning. I will/should send patch v2 for it within this week (2014-04-06). Next, when I send trivial patches, I will/should cc to qemu-trivial. I guess, most of my future patches will be trivial patches (and for me, trivial != minor). Thanks. -- Chen Gang Open, share, and attitude like air, water, and life which God blessed
