On 03/18/2014 12:23 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> +#define USATACC(bits, shift) \
> +    do { \
> +        va = (int##bits##_t)((a >> shift) & ((1 << bits) - 1));         \
> +        vb = (uint##bits##_t)((b >> shift) & ((1 << bits) - 1));        \

The masking seems redundant with the cast.
Perhaps better to use extract32/sextract32?

> +        r |= (uint32_t) (vr & ((1 << bits) - 1)) << shift;              \

Perhaps better with deposit32?  That implies an unnecessary mask of R, but
perhaps the compiler can clean that up...


Otherwise I don't actually see anything wrong,

Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <r...@twiddle.net>


r~

Reply via email to