On 12/30/2009 08:19 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 12/30/2009 04:17 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
That's a good idea, but it would mean that we'd need into ioapic and
info ioapic-kvm if we go for a split implementation.
I don't think that's a problem. A developer will be smart enough to
know that they need to do that (and will get an error if they don't).
I wasn't worried about that, only the increased code duplication.
I wasn't thinking there would be an info ioapic command but rather a
generic device-info command that would work with any qdev device. No
code duplication (in fact, much, much less in the long term).
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
