On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 05:26:50PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 05:36:40PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 09:20:20PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > > According to C99, realloc(non_null, 0) != free(non_null), that's why > > > it is forbidden in QEMU. > > > > > > When there are no symbols, nsyms equals to 0. Free the syms structure > > > and set it to NULL instead of reallocating it with a size of 0. > > > > > > This fixes -kernel with stripped kernels. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Aurelien Jarno <aurel...@aurel32.net> > > > > I didn't know, you live and learn. FWIW > > Can you please stop being annoying about that? I submit non-trivial > patches like this one before committing them. This is nothing new.
Oh, this is a misunderstanding, sorry. I really meant that I lived another day and learned about realloc(p, 0) being implementation dependend. That is all. > -- > Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 > aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
