The Wednesday 12 Mar 2014 à 10:40:00 (+0100), Kevin Wolf wrote : > Am 11.03.2014 um 17:41 hat Benoît Canet geschrieben: > > I have the impression that you are silently fixing other nits; > > Am I? > > Not intentionally at least. I think I can justify every single line of > the patch with respect to the bug described in the commit message. We > need to recursive into the protocol layer, and we need to refresh > bs->total_sectors. For drivers implementing the callback, we need to > recurse to bs->file between the internal open/close pair. > > I can't see what could be left out in this patch.
I didn't understood the implication on recursion at first sight. Best regards Benoît > > Kevin >
