On 23.12.2009, at 20:52, Amit Shah wrote: > Hello, > > This series splits up the patches by functionality. Note, however, > that patches 2-6 introduce some functionality that's advertised to the > guest as having to work all at once or not at all. Also, the savevm > version is bumped only once but save/restore state is added in each of > the patches. They are split only for easier reviewability. > > There are a few differences from yesterday's posting: comments from > Markus have been addressed and also some issues that were pending have > been resolved. > > There's still a couple of fixmes: > - The vl.c bits aren't right yet (need to accomodate s390). > - Locking isn't perfect, a few extra locks are needed, but it doesn't > matter as long as qemu doesn't run it all separately (I've tested > with the kvm tree with -smp 2 as well and it runs fine).
CC s390x-softmmu/s390-virtio-bus.o CC s390x-softmmu/s390-virtio.o /tmp/qemu/hw/s390-virtio.c:29:31: error: hw/virtio-console.h: No such file or directory make[1]: *** [s390-virtio.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... make: *** [subdir-s390x-softmmu] Error 2 You should be able to at least compile test it for S390 with ./configure --target-list=s390x-softmmu. Linking should fail afterwards, but errors like this should be rather easy to spot that way :-) I'm not sure how responsive I'll be during the next couple days. So I can't promise I'll be able to test / fix whatever you send me :). Alex
