On Mon, 2014-03-03 at 15:52 +0100, Andreas Färber wrote: > Am 03.03.2014 14:03, schrieb Marcel Apfelbaum: > > On Mon, 2014-03-03 at 13:57 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > >> Il 03/03/2014 13:58, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto: > >>> On Sun, Mar 02, 2014 at 03:07:05PM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote: > >>>>> The machine registration flow is refactored to use the QOM > >>>>> functionality. > >>>>> Instead of linking the machines into a list, each machine has a type > >>>>> and the types can be traversed in the QOM way. > >>>>> > >>>>> Signed-off-by: Marcel Apfelbaum <marce...@redhat.com> > >>> Nice. > > Thanks! > > > >>> > >>> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> > >>> > >>> This patch already looks like a nice cleanup. How about queueing > >>> this and the preceding patch straight away? > >>> Which tree is appropriate? I'm guessing QOM? > >>> > >> > >> Fine by me. > > Thanks! > > > > Where can I find the QOM tree? I ask because I will rebase the series on > > this tree... > > github.com/afaerber/qemu-cpu qom-next > > but I hope rebasing won't be necessary, just give me some more time to > look at the series. Sure, I appreciate you are going over it.
> > Thanks a lot for your efforts already, it sounds very promising! Thanks! Marcel > > Cheers, > Andreas >
