Il 26/02/2014 18:15, Eduardo Habkost ha scritto:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 04:49:44PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
From: Wanlong Gao <gaowanl...@cn.fujitsu.com>
If the total number of the assigned numa nodes memory is not
equal to the assigned ram size, it will write the wrong data
to ACPI table, then the guest will ignore the wrong ACPI table
and recognize all memory to one node. It's buggy, we should
check it to ensure that we write the right data to ACPI table.
Signed-off-by: Wanlong Gao <gaowanl...@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imamm...@redhat.com>
---
numa.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/numa.c b/numa.c
index 7845036..d12a4f2 100644
--- a/numa.c
+++ b/numa.c
@@ -151,6 +151,16 @@ void set_numa_nodes(void)
node_mem[i] = ram_size - usedmem;
}
+ uint64_t numa_total = 0;
I was going to point out that variable declarations in the middle of
blocks goes against coding style (at least I was told so), but my patch
to amend CODING_STYLE to document it was ignored for 2 weeks, already.
So, I am not sure we really have that rule.
(Personally I am not against declaring variables in the middle of
blocks, I think it makes the code more readable, and it is perfectly
valid C99 code.)
Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com>
I agree, but I fixed it already.
Paolo
