Am 25.02.2014 um 11:47 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben: > Il 25/02/2014 11:15, Stefan Hajnoczi ha scritto: > >On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Kevin Wolf <kw...@redhat.com> wrote: > >>> External QOM interfaces have their place, especially for debugging or > >>> trying out things before there is a proper API, but it's not as the > >>> primary external interface. > >Yes, I agree. > > -object is an exception to this though, isn't it?
I'd prefer if -object weren't the primary interface for anything. We could define a few stable types that are meant to be created, queried and manipulated using QOM, but it would blur the line. Kevin
