On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 08:35:53AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote: > Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> I am really confused wrt stable 0.12 branching policy. >> For example I see this, in master: >> >> commit d587e0787153f0224a6140c5015609963ceaabfb >> Author: Anthony Liguori <aligu...@us.ibm.com> >> Date: Mon Dec 14 11:36:53 2009 -0600 >> >> Revert "pci: interrupt disable bit support" >> >> This reverts commit 0ea5709a32085f7d14901a09d12bd35f9b267607. >> >> Per discussion with Michael Tsirkin, this is too risky for 0.12 >> >> Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aligu...@us.ibm.com> >> >> (this was cherry-picked in stable-0.12 as well). >> From the comment, this revert makes sense for stable-0.12 >> but not for master. Is this an attempt to keep stable and master >> as close as possible? I expected master development to proceed while >> stable-0.12 would get just bugfixes. No? >> > > It was a mistake. I've already got it recommitted in master. Just need > to push. > > Regards, > > Anthony Liguori > >> Thanks, >>
I see. So I think we should revert f9bf77dd1f838b0061172fe41709b221956da2f5 on stable-0.12 as well: interrupt disable and interrupt status appeared in the same spec revision, so it might surprise guests to see one but not the other. -- MST
