On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 09:41:02AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Hani Benhabiles <kroo...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > The error message as currently used is confusing as there are no "balloon"
> > or
> > "spice" devices.
> >
> > (qemu) balloon 1024
> > balloon: Device 'balloon' has not been activated
> >
> > With this patch:
> >
> > (qemu) balloon 1024
> > balloon: No balloon device has been activated
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hani Benhabiles <h...@linux.com>
> > Suggested-by: Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > include/qapi/qmp/qerror.h | 2 +-
> > qmp.c | 2 --
> > 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/qapi/qmp/qerror.h b/include/qapi/qmp/qerror.h
> > index 73c67b7..25193c9 100644
> > --- a/include/qapi/qmp/qerror.h
> > +++ b/include/qapi/qmp/qerror.h
> > @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ void qerror_report_err(Error *err);
> > ERROR_CLASS_GENERIC_ERROR, "Device '%s' does not support hotplugging"
> >
> > #define QERR_DEVICE_NOT_ACTIVE \
> > - ERROR_CLASS_DEVICE_NOT_ACTIVE, "Device '%s' has not been activated"
> > + ERROR_CLASS_DEVICE_NOT_ACTIVE, "No %s device has been activated"
> >
> > #define QERR_DEVICE_NOT_ENCRYPTED \
> > ERROR_CLASS_GENERIC_ERROR, "Device '%s' is not encrypted"
> > diff --git a/qmp.c b/qmp.c
> > index d0d98e7..ffddd26 100644
> > --- a/qmp.c
> > +++ b/qmp.c
> > @@ -289,7 +289,6 @@ void qmp_set_password(const char *protocol, const char
> > *password,
> >
> > if (strcmp(protocol, "spice") == 0) {
> > if (!using_spice) {
> > - /* correct one? spice isn't a device ,,, */
> > error_set(errp, QERR_DEVICE_NOT_ACTIVE, "spice");
> > return;
> > }
> > @@ -337,7 +336,6 @@ void qmp_expire_password(const char *protocol, const
> > char *whenstr,
> >
> > if (strcmp(protocol, "spice") == 0) {
> > if (!using_spice) {
> > - /* correct one? spice isn't a device ,,, */
> > error_set(errp, QERR_DEVICE_NOT_ACTIVE, "spice");
> > return;
> > }
>
> The wording of the error message is still suboptimal for the
> !using_spice case, but it's an improvement. I'd leave the two comments
> alone, though. Hani, if you agree, then Luiz could perhaps merge your
> patch with these two hunks dropped.
>
> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com>
Sure, no problem with dropping them. Thanks for the review, Markus!
