On 02/21/2014 12:55 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 20/02/2014 14:50, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto: >> As suffixes do not make sense for sPAPR's device tree and >> there is no way to filter them out on the BusState::get_fw_dev_path >> level, let's add an ability for the external caller to specify >> whether to apply suffixes or not. >> >> We could handle suffixes in SLOF (ignore for now) but this would require >> serious rework in the node opening code in SLOF which has no obvious >> benefit for the currently emulated sPAPR machine. > > For the record, the commit message is not entirely correct in presenting > the situation. QEMU *does not care in any way* of benefits for the > currently emulated sPAPR machine. The benefit would be to QEMU in having > simpler code. > > You just got a wildcard because Forth is scary. :)
I know :) Should I remove that part and replace it with the "scary" one? > Paolo > >> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <a...@ozlabs.ru> >> --- >> Changes: >> v4: >> * changed commit message about not having plans in SLOF rework as it is >> scary :) > > -- Alexey
