On 01/22/2014 11:17 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: > On 01/22/2014 09:16 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> Il 22/01/2014 05:19, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto: >>> On 12/11/2013 09:22 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >>>> With the great help from Paolo, I am presenting yet another try of >>>> bootindex >>>> support on sPAPR, this time with some QOM fixes. Details are in the >>>> commit messages. >>>> Please, comment. Thanks. >>>> >>>> Alexey Kardashevskiy (5): >>>> boot: extend get_boot_devices_list() to ignore suffixes >>>> spapr-llan: add to boot device list >>>> spapr-vio: fix firmware names >>>> qdev: introduce FWPathProvider interface >>>> spapr: define interface to fix device pathname >>>> >>>> Hervé Poussineau (1): >>>> qom: detect bad reentrance during object_class_foreach >>>> >>>> Paolo Bonzini (2): >>>> qom: do not register interface "types" in the type table >>>> vl: allow customizing the class of /machine >>>> >>>> hw/core/Makefile.objs | 1 + >>>> hw/core/fw-path-provider.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++ >>>> hw/core/qdev.c | 18 +++++++++- >>>> hw/net/spapr_llan.c | 3 ++ >>>> hw/nvram/fw_cfg.c | 2 +- >>>> hw/ppc/spapr.c | 80 >>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- >>>> hw/ppc/spapr_vio.c | 2 ++ >>>> include/hw/boards.h | 1 + >>>> include/hw/fw-path-provider.h | 31 +++++++++++++++++ >>>> include/sysemu/sysemu.h | 2 +- >>>> qom/object.c | 17 +++++++-- >>>> tests/Makefile | 1 + >>>> vl.c | 11 ++++-- >>>> 13 files changed, 193 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) >>>> create mode 100644 hw/core/fw-path-provider.c >>>> create mode 100644 include/hw/fw-path-provider.h >>> >>> >>> Some bits from this went upstream but none of them is mine. What am I >>> missing here? Thanks. >> >> No idea, perhaps it's because the same patches were present in multiple >> series? Alex, are you picking up what's left? >> >> Paolo > > > In the "Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] qom: detect bad reentrance during > object_class_foreach" thread Andreas told me: > > === > Be patient. > > 1) I am on holidays and thus not available full-time. > 2) Alex has already sent out his ppc PULL, so no urgency. > 3) As mentioned, I plan to post QOM and CPU PULLs later today. > > And no, you don't need to repost after parts of your series get applied > pretty much unmodified. > === > > So I wonder if I am not just patient enough :)
Nobody seems picking up the bits I am interested in from this :-/ What can I possibly do to get this in upstream?... I feel I am doing something systematically wrong but nobody is telling me what exactly. Thanks. -- Alexey
