Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilb...@redhat.com> writes: > * Peter Crosthwaite (peter.crosthwa...@xilinx.com) wrote: >> This was guarding against a full fifo rather than an empty fifo when >> popping. Fix. >> >> Signed-off-by: Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwa...@xilinx.com> >> --- > > Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilb...@redhat.com> > > I think this brings it back to how it was on the old FIFO code.
This does make me wonder why it was changed? Was there another crashing case it fixed? -- Alex Bennée
