On 9 February 2014 02:59, Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwa...@xilinx.com> wrote:
> Agreed. With diff-correction based on this scheme: > > Reviewed-by: Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwa...@xilinx.com> > > But the nice thing about having named fields is it >> doesn't actually matter what order things go in. >> > > But for similar entries its much more readable if they are self-consistent. Yes; this patch in particular was rather inconsistent and I have fixed it. thanks -- PMM