On 5 February 2014 12:24, Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> wrote: > As to why it's complicated for Peter to fix, here's what Peter wrote: > "That series got very big on me with complications. I think near term > we just proceed with the revert. Sorry for the delay." I have no > reason to second-guess him. > > Promptly reverting patches that cause regressions when a fix isn't ready > is standard operating procedure. We can delay a revert a reasonable > amount of time to deliberate what to do, and perhaps find a fix. We did > that, and then some: four weeks. We should revert, and try again. > Neither harm nor shame in that.
I agree in general here, which is why I'm going to apply this patch. While we're talking about regressions: Paolo, do we have a good fix for the PPC boot regression yet or should we revert the patch which caused that? thanks -- PMM
