Peter Maydell writes: > On 4 February 2014 14:57, Richard Henderson <r...@twiddle.net> wrote: >> I suppose I have no major objection to the feature, although frankly it's >> not especially exciting. I can't really imagine ever wanting to bulk trace >> all of the helpers. Tracing specific helpers on a target-by-target basis, >> sure. But that can be done just as easily as adding tracing code to any >> other bit of C.
> I think the things people seem to actually want (judging > from occasional postings to the list) are things like: > * trace all guest memory accesses > * trace all guest instruction executions > Does this patchset get us usefully towards that kind of thing? > Not sure... It does trace guest memory accesses (last patch), but I also have other patches (not sent to keep things simple) for tracing instructions and BBLs executed, as well as the registers accessed by these. Thanks, Lluis -- "And it's much the same thing with knowledge, for whenever you learn something new, the whole world becomes that much richer." -- The Princess of Pure Reason, as told by Norton Juster in The Phantom Tollbooth
