Am 2014-02-01 21:31, schrieb Michael Walle:
Am Samstag, 1. Februar 2014, 19:00:01 schrieb Peter Maydell:
On 20 January 2014 19:34, Michael Walle <mich...@walle.cc> wrote:
> Do not use qemu_log().
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <mich...@walle.cc>
> ---
>
> hw/misc/lm32_sys.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/misc/lm32_sys.c b/hw/misc/lm32_sys.c
> index 8176cdb..6af0cca 100644
> --- a/hw/misc/lm32_sys.c
> +++ b/hw/misc/lm32_sys.c
> @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ static void sys_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
>
> case R_PASSFAIL:
> s->regs[addr] = value;
> testname = (char *)s->testname;
>
> - qemu_log("TC %-32s %s\n", testname, (value) ? "FAILED" : "OK");
> + fprintf(stderr, "TC %-32s %s\n", testname, (value) ? "FAILED" :
> "OK");
>
> break;
This looks wrong to me -- devices shouldn't print to stderr, ideally.
lm32_sys is actually no real device. it is just used for unit testing.
Hi Peter,
is this ok? or do you have some better idea? ideally, the lm32 target
should use semihosting and should print to stdout/stderr itself. but
that is not the case atm.
-michael
