On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 10:07:47PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote: > Am 20.01.2014 21:39, schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin: > > On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 04:36:56PM -0200, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > >> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 02:41:07PM -0200, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > >>> Resend of series submitted on 24 November 2013, that didn't get any > >>> reply. Only > >>> change is a trivial conflict on patch 7/7. > >> > >> Question: which tree is the most appropriate to get this in? qom-cpu? > >> kvm? > > > > Either kvm or my pc tree. > > Seems unrelated to qom. > > Seems unrelated to PC. ;) I've been maintaining target-i386/cpu.c as > part of my QOM CPU tree according to MAINTAINERS.
Ah, right. Cool, the less work for me the better. > I don't mind whether this goes through Paolo's or my tree, but for me to > take KVM related changes, I expect review from the KVM side. > > > Paolo - want to review and take this? > > Regards, > Andreas > > >>> target-i386/cpu.c | 89 > >>> +++++++++++++------------------------------------------ > >>> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-) > > -- > SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany > GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
