On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:52:19PM +1000, Peter Crosthwaite wrote: > > Perhaps we should just rely on > > NetClient->link_ok. > > > > I think we are in agreement then? There is no need for phy.link_ok as > same information is captured in NetClient. This means there is no > link_ok field to migrate. Just migrate the phy registers themselves. > > For completeness you just need to poll NetClient state post_load which > will nicely handle my degenerate case of link activity between save > and load (same handler as link_state_changed). In the more usual case > of the link state not changing between save and load, this function > call will just be a nop, leading to no change of state on the freshly > migrated phy registers.
Sounds good. Stefan
