Il 16/01/2014 03:50, Michael Roth ha scritto: > If we go to that effort, it may make sense to try to re-license to GPLv2+ > while we're at it, but either way I think this should be done as a separate > patchset, and shouldn't hold up Wenchao's series. I can send that out, since > it's my screw-up. >
Removing Red Hat, Blue Swirl and Stefan Weil, who have agreed on a blanket relicensing of GPLv2-only code to GPLv2+ leaves only half a dozen people: Anthony Liguori: anth...@codemonkey.ws (IBM?) Michael Roth: mdr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com (IBM?) Peter Maydell: peter.mayd...@linaro.org Richard Henderson: r...@twiddle.net Tomoki Sekiyama: tomoki.sekiy...@hds.com Paolo