Il 16/01/2014 03:50, Michael Roth ha scritto:
> If we go to that effort, it may make sense to try to re-license to GPLv2+
> while we're at it, but either way I think this should be done as a separate
> patchset, and shouldn't hold up Wenchao's series. I can send that out, since
> it's my screw-up.
> 

Removing Red Hat, Blue Swirl and Stefan Weil, who have agreed on a
blanket relicensing of GPLv2-only code to GPLv2+ leaves only half a
dozen people:

Anthony Liguori: anth...@codemonkey.ws (IBM?)
Michael Roth: mdr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com (IBM?)
Peter Maydell: peter.mayd...@linaro.org
Richard Henderson: r...@twiddle.net
Tomoki Sekiyama: tomoki.sekiy...@hds.com

Paolo

Reply via email to